Wells Score Calculator (DVT and PE)
Score the clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism using the Wells criteria, with the two-level categories that drive D-dimer and imaging decisions.
—
—
What the Wells Score Does
The Wells score turns the clinical assessment of a possible venous thromboembolism into a structured probability. It exists in two separate versions — one for deep vein thrombosis and one for pulmonary embolism — and they are not interchangeable: the criteria and the thresholds differ. Use the toggle above to switch models.
The DVT Model
- Active cancer (treatment within 6 months or palliative): +1
- Paralysis, paresis or recent plaster immobilisation: +1
- Bedridden 3 days or more, or major surgery within 12 weeks: +1
- Localised tenderness along the deep venous system: +1
- Entire leg swollen: +1
- Calf swelling 3 cm or more versus the other leg: +1
- Pitting oedema confined to the symptomatic leg: +1
- Collateral superficial veins (non-varicose): +1
- Previously documented DVT: +1
- Alternative diagnosis at least as likely as DVT: −2
In the two-level interpretation used by most guidelines, 2 or more points means DVT likely and imaging is arranged; 1 or fewer means DVT unlikely, where a negative D-dimer can exclude the diagnosis without ultrasound in most patients.
The PE Model
- Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT: +3
- PE is the most likely diagnosis: +3
- Heart rate above 100: +1.5
- Immobilisation 3 days or more, or surgery within 4 weeks: +1.5
- Previous DVT or PE: +1.5
- Haemoptysis: +1
- Malignancy (treatment within 6 months or palliative): +1
Here the two-level cut-off is more than 4 points: above it, PE is considered likely and imaging is arranged directly; at 4 or below, PE is unlikely and an age-adjusted D-dimer can exclude it in most patients. A three-level version (low, moderate, high) exists for both models and is used in some pathways.
How It Fits Into a Diagnostic Pathway
- D-dimer is only useful in the unlikely group. Its value is in exclusion, and its specificity falls with age, pregnancy, infection, malignancy and recent surgery.
- Age-adjusted D-dimer raises the cut-off with age (age × 10 µg/L above 50 years) and safely reduces imaging in older adults.
- PERC can rule out PE without any testing in a small, strictly defined low-risk group.
- Imaging — compression ultrasound for DVT, CT pulmonary angiography or V/Q scanning for PE — remains the reference standard in the likely group.
- Pregnancy and renal impairment need modified pathways, where radiation and contrast considerations change the sequence.
Limitations
- The score is a probability estimate built on clinical judgement, and two assessors can score the same patient differently.
- It performs less well in inpatients, in pregnancy, and in patients with a previous VTE, where it tends to overestimate probability.
- “PE is the most likely diagnosis” is inherently subjective, and it carries the largest single weight in the PE model.
- It does not replace clinical review, and it must never be used to withhold assessment in an unstable patient.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use the DVT model for a suspected PE?
No. They are separate validated tools with different criteria and thresholds. The DVT model assesses leg symptoms; the PE model assesses cardiopulmonary presentation.
Does a low Wells score rule out a clot?
Not by itself. A low score needs a negative D-dimer (or an alternative explanation) before VTE can be excluded. In the likely group, imaging is required regardless of D-dimer.
Why does “alternative diagnosis” subtract two points?
Because a convincing competing explanation substantially lowers the probability of DVT. It is the one negative item in the model and it frequently moves a patient from the likely to the unlikely group.